|
Spitfire Pepper Spray
Rev. David Beeson
Pepper spray is possibly
the best tool on the market for a less than lethal
conflict resolution (excluding tasers and stun guns,
normally wielded only by law enforcement officers). It
is light, easy to use and requires little training to
master. Perhaps most importantly, its effects are
temporary; using pepper spray does not result in broken
bones or bullet holes. While often marketed to women or
those who do not wish to carry a gun (the reason I
bought it for my wife, Shanna), it is also an excellent
option for men and those who do carry.

|
|
In order to ensure everyone is on the same page, I
want to first mention a few general things about pepper
spray. Its main ingredient is Oleoresin Capsicum, or OC.
Most sprays have a concentration of around ten percent
OC. However, one should note that this percentage does
not reflect the spray's "hotness." This factor is
measured in Scoville Heat Units, or SHUs. Most personal
protection sprays are approximately ten percent at two
million SHUs. Therefore, the question becomes, "if most
sprays are chemically similar, why choose one over
another?" The answer is the dispenser.
Spitfire's dispenser has been awarded five patents
and is the genius behind the product line. It is
designed to spray at all angles, something the
competitors' sprays cannot do. Its construction lends
itself to an intuitive grip, not the "aerosol can" grip
that others require. Another great feature is the
passive safety. Most dispensers require the button to be
moved to the side and then depressed. While this sounds
easy, this action could be quite complex and
counterintuitive under stress, resulting in lost time
and possibly lost lives. Spitfire's safety can be
overcome with the single motion of simultaneously
pushing forward and down. I liken this to the brilliance
behind Glock's Safe Action System.

|
|
Some may be initially
concerned, as I was, about accidental discharges with
this system. After carrying the pepper spray for over
three months, I am glad to announce that Spitfire's
claims are accurate. It will not go off unless you want
it to. I even decided to test Spitfire's claims that the
dispenser is child resistant for pre-schoolers. I
explained to my four-year-old child the dangers of
pepper spray and showed him how I had removed the pepper
canister, rendering the dispenser safe. Next, I handed
it to him and told him to push the button. I was
pleasantly surprised to see he could either push it down
or out -- but not both. I even told him how to do it,
but he still was unable. The ability to prevent
accidental discharges while providing quick and easy
access to the pepper spray is what gives Spitfire the
upper hand.
Since my tests focused on the dispenser and not the
spray, I utilized inert practice canisters. The practice
canister is a great option that all pepper spray
companies should offer. It allows you to practice
spraying without emitting the OC pepper. The only
downside to using the inert formula, if this is a
downside at all, is that it is difficult to gauge the
accuracy of a shot since there is no burning sensation.
There were several times I could feel a large dose on my
face, but other times I would simply get mist on my
goggles. How effective would such a shot have been with
pepper spray? Regardless, a light mist is better than
none at all. I established three tests using the
practice canisters. For the first test, I would run at
Shanna and she would spray me while holding the pepper
spray at hip level. This would determine how easy it
would be to aim the dispenser without holding it at eye
level. Just as perfect Weaver stances and sight pictures
do not occur in real-life shootings, I doubt the
proverbial "arm extended at eye level" pepper spray
stance occurs. Second, I would grab Shanna from behind
and she would spray me over her back. This would verify
or nullify Spitfire's claims that the spray can be
intuitively sprayed behind the back. Third, Shanna would
sit in the car with the door open and the keys in the
ignition. From about twenty feet away, I would say, "Go"
and then run at the car. This test was designed to see
how long it would take her to detach the spray from her
keychain and spray me. Although expecting my attacks and
therefore on guard and moving quickly, Shanna could have
performed similarly in a real life encounter with a
little practice.

|
|
The first test resulted in good
shots to my neck and face. While Shanna did not
necessarily hit my eyes every time, the overspray could
have been enough to affect my eyes, and the shot to my
face would certainly have been enough to affect my
breathing. These results may not seem impressive, but it
should be noted that such a shot would have been
impossible with traditional pepper sprays. Those
canisters require one to raise his or her hand to almost
eye level to shoot. The second experiment yielded the
same results. While I may not have been blinded, I can't
help but think that an earful or mouthful of pepper
spray would be painful as well. Shanna found that
pointing the spray behind and down, as though she were
scratching her back, resulted in a good hit. Simply
pointing it behind her sometimes resulted in grazed
shot.
The third test was the most impressive. She found
there are several things one can do to better his or her
chances of survival. First, Shanna let the keys hang to
where the dispenser's button was always facing her in
the car. This allowed her to use the same grabbing
motion every time to quickly remove the spray from the
keychain and point it at me. (Another great feature of
the quick disconnect is that it is loose enough to allow
you to rotate it, but tight enough to allow the above
experiment. It will not roll over while you are
driving). My wife was able to grab the spray, detach it,
turn and spray me in two and a half seconds or less,
which was about the time I arrived at the car. This took
a little longer than the standard twenty-one feet drill
because I had to slow down and reach inside the car.
These tests displayed the value of practicing with
pepper spray. Should you decide to purchase, I would
suggest you also buy several practice spray two-packs
and occasionally run these types of drills. I invite you
to contact Spitfire if you have any questions about
pepper spray. I called them when a juvenile in my church
purposefully used my wife's spray on another boy. I
wanted to make sure the float
test applied to partially spent canisters and not simply
aged canisters (the float test is a test you can perform
to see if your canister is still good. I tried it with
spent and full canisters and it works). Walter Cardwell,
Spitfire's president, fielded the call personally. I had
a pleasant conversation with him in which he not only
answered my question, but gave me some interesting
company history as well. It is indeed a rare thing to
have a good product and good customer service under one
roof. These experiences have convinced me there is one
pepper spray worth purchasing for civilian use:
Spitfire. In his book Essential Guide to Handguns, Dr.
Bruce Eimer names Spitfire as "the best portable OC
pepper spray manufacturer in the world" and declares it
to be "the best non-lethal pepper spray product out
there for assuring your survival.(1)
(1) Rementer, Stephen and Eimer, Bruce. Essential
Guide to Handguns. Copyright 2005 by Looseleaf Law
Publications. p. V, 50.
www.spitfire.us
Rev. David Beeson is the Assistant Pastor at a
Pentecostal church in Shreveport, LA. His carry guns
currently include a Kahr CW9 and a Glock 19. He enjoys
reading, preaching, shooting and spending time with his
family. You can reach him at w5qap@hotmail.com.
© 2003-2008 U.S. Concealed
Carry Association. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction
without permission prohibited.
|